Saturday, April 23, 2011

Review of Sweetly, by Jackson Pearce

Release Date: August 23, 2011


Goodreads saysTwelve years ago, Gretchen, her twin sister, and her brother went looking for a witch in the forest. They found something. Maybe it was a witch, maybe a monster, they aren’t sure—they were running too fast to tell. Either way, Gretchen’s twin sister was never seen again. 

Years later, after being thrown out of their house, Gretchen and Ansel find themselves in Live Oak, South Carolina, a place on the verge of becoming a ghost town. They move in with Sophia Kelly, a young and beautiful chocolatier owner who opens not only her home, but her heart to Gretchen and Ansel. 

Yet the witch isn’t gone—it’s here, lurking in the forests of Live Oak, preying on Live Oak girls every year after Sophia Kelly’s infamous chocolate festival. But Gretchen is determined to stop running from witches in the forest, and start fighting back. Alongside Samuel Reynolds, a boy as quick with a gun as he is a sarcastic remark, Gretchen digs deeper into the mystery of not only what the witch is, but how it chooses its victims. Yet the further she investigates, the more she finds herself wondering who the real monster is, and if love can be as deadly as it is beautiful.

I say: 
Fairy tales are my thing. I love them. Hansel and Gretel isn't a story that's retold very often, so I was excited to read Sweetly. It's technically a sequel to Sisters Red, Jackson Pearce's previous novel and a retelling of Red Riding Hood, but I don't really think you have to read the first to understand the second. It would make sense without it. 


Sweetly is truly well written. The story kept me entertained, and the characters were incredibly crafted. The character of Sophia, in particular, was really enjoyable. She's believable and real, and of all of the cast, she was probably the one I liked the most. The talk of candy making was interesting and made for a good story. 


The southern feel to the novel, and the dynamics of the town also really added to the novel. Mixed in all together, it definitely makes the book worth reading. 


I felt, however, like some parts of the novel were a little bit odd; the monsters -- Fenris -- really didn't make much sense unless you've read Sister's Red, and even then, they seemed out of place at times. The novel had some of the epic qualities that Sister's Red possesses, but they were disjointed and mostly came at the -- granted, truly impressive -- finale.

I liked it, don't get me wrong, but the novel felt open ended. It's a solid 3 and 1/2 stars.

More later.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

This Summer

Guys, I know I'm a bad blogger. I'm sorry. Seriously, I am. Very, very sorry.
But, um, I do have good news!
So, I entered for the chance to be in a writing camp back in Febuary. The camp looked seriously fantastic; awesome teachers, awesome people, chance of a lifetime, blah blah blah. Only problem? I've never written short stories; I've never written hard science fiction, which is what I would need to enter the camp. Competition to get in is relatively fierce, but I sent in a story anyway, figuring well, what the heck.
And. I. Got. In.
And guess what?
Tamora Pierce is one of the teachers.
Tamora. Freaking. Pierce.
Granted, all of the teachers are amazing. The link up above can show you them. Beyond that, I'll get to go to a writing conference. But the chance to meet -- and learn from!! -- Tamora Pierce?
I believe the exact response I have was acakasfalskfboasfasda.
My love for Tamora Pierce is probably unhealthy. It's been blogged about here and here.
And now I get to meet her.
Anyway. More later, promise. I just wanted to share my excitement. Also, poke in my head and promise that Chemistry might have swallowed part of my soul, but I am resilient and will always come back to blog.
(Yeah. We'll pretend that wasn't weird.)
Bye!

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Cookie?

Hey, y'all. Guess what?
No, seriously, guess.
It's SPRING.